Did you mean A or B? Supporting Clarification Dialog for Entity Disambiguation
نویسندگان
چکیده
When interacting with a system, users often request information about an entity by specifying a string that may have multiple possible interpretations. Humans are quite good at recognizing when an ambiguity exists and resolving the ambiguity given contextual cues. This disambiguation task is more complicated in automated systems. As systems have more and more different entities and entity types available to them, they may better detect potential ambiguities (e.g., ‘orange’ as a color or fruit). However, it becomes harder to resolve entities automatically and effectively. In this position paper we discuss challenges in interacting with users to ask clarifying questions for entity identification. We propose three approaches, illustrating their strengths and weaknesses.
منابع مشابه
قانون طلایی تدارک حمایت از دانش آموزان با نیازهای ویژه در کلاسهای فراگیر: از دیگران آنطور حمایت کنید که دوست دارید از شما حمایت کنند
Consider for a moment that the school system paid someone to be with you supporting you 8 hours a day, 5 days a week. Now, imagine that you had no say over who that support person was or how she or he supported you. Or imagine that someone regularly stopped into your place of employment to provide you with one-on-one support. This person was present for all your interactions, escorted you to th...
متن کاملAnything to Clarify? Report Your Parsing Ambiguities!
An important factor for the acceptance of spoken dialogue systems is their ability to react flexibly on misunderstandings between user and system. This paper addresses the issue of grounding utterances in task-oriented human-computer dialogues. It focuses on the aspect of handling ambiguities while parsing word lattices from a speech recognizer: The parser detects the origin and the type of amb...
متن کاملUsing Utterance and Semantic Level Confidence for Interactive Spoken Dialog Clarification
Spoken dialog tasks incur many errors including speech recognition errors, understanding errors, and even dialog management errors. These errors create a big gap between the user’s intention and the system’s understanding, which eventually results in a misinterpretation. To fill in the gap, people in human-to-human dialogs try to clarify the major causes of the misunderstanding to selectively c...
متن کاملInteractive Clarification Dialog Management for Spoken Language Understanding
Spoken dialog tasks incur many errors including speech recognition errors, understanding errors, and even dialog management errors. These errors create a big gap between user's will and the system's understanding, and eventually result in a misinterpretation. To fill in the gap, people in human-to-human dialog try to clarify the major causes of the misunderstanding and selectively correct them....
متن کاملLearning an Optimal Sequence of Questions for the Disambiguation of Queries over Structured Data
Intelligent systems interacting with users often need to relate ambiguous natural language phrases to formal entities which can be further processed. This work strives for learning an optimal sequence of disambiguation questions asked by an agent in order to achieve a perfect interactive disambiguation, setting itself off against previous work on interactive and adaptive dialogue systems for di...
متن کامل